<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Reasons You Should Listen to Boomers (even if they drive you crazy)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:53:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I.C. Land</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-10121</link>
		<dc:creator>I.C. Land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-10121</guid>
		<description>Smug Grungers listen?  Never happen </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smug Grungers listen?  Never happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Stephen Lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Stephen Lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-322</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just wondering if we should just make up our own mind who&#039;s telling the damn truth? I mean, is the Boomer Al Gore right about climate change or is the Boomer Rush Limbo telling it like it is?

Seems to me we ought to listen and cheer for what&#039;s right, no matter if it comes from the mouths of babesor the graying aged.

Seems to me, Dave, you&#039;re simply promoting the idea that we ought to listen, or not to listen, to someone simply based upon their skin color, their gender or, in your thinking, their age.

Frankly, Dave, I think you&#039;re a generational bigot. A simple-minded, tiny little mushy generational bigot: Forget the truth, forget the facts, in your way of thinking, and simply notice the generational class of the speaker, the leader, The One you deem worthy of your attention.

How utterly small and pathetic is this way of hearing and perception, Dave? You&#039;re simply seeking the easy way, the bigot&#039;s way of determining what is right and wrong.

I&#039;ll have no part of it, Dave. And neither should a bright guy like you, pal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just wondering if we should just make up our own mind who&#8217;s telling the damn truth? I mean, is the Boomer Al Gore right about climate change or is the Boomer Rush Limbo telling it like it is?</p>
<p>Seems to me we ought to listen and cheer for what&#8217;s right, no matter if it comes from the mouths of babesor the graying aged.</p>
<p>Seems to me, Dave, you&#8217;re simply promoting the idea that we ought to listen, or not to listen, to someone simply based upon their skin color, their gender or, in your thinking, their age.</p>
<p>Frankly, Dave, I think you&#8217;re a generational bigot. A simple-minded, tiny little mushy generational bigot: Forget the truth, forget the facts, in your way of thinking, and simply notice the generational class of the speaker, the leader, The One you deem worthy of your attention.</p>
<p>How utterly small and pathetic is this way of hearing and perception, Dave? You&#8217;re simply seeking the easy way, the bigot&#8217;s way of determining what is right and wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have no part of it, Dave. And neither should a bright guy like you, pal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Sohigian</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Sohigian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-304</guid>
		<description>@susan - that&#039;s great! Like when you are in a foreign country: smile and nod, smile and nod. funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@susan &#8211; that&#8217;s great! Like when you are in a foreign country: smile and nod, smile and nod. funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Should listen to boomers? No, been there done that. If forced, will smile and nod head at appropriate intervals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should listen to boomers? No, been there done that. If forced, will smile and nod head at appropriate intervals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-232</guid>
		<description>because they shot bobbie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because they shot bobbie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew E</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Although it&#039;s interesting: the U.S. has had seven G.I. Presidents and no Silent Presidents, but Canada has had only one G.I. Prime Minister (Trudeau, and he wasn&#039;t a typical G.I.) and five Silent Prime Ministers (Clark, Turner, Mulroney, Chretien, Martin). I&#039;ve often wondered why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it&#8217;s interesting: the U.S. has had seven G.I. Presidents and no Silent Presidents, but Canada has had only one G.I. Prime Minister (Trudeau, and he wasn&#8217;t a typical G.I.) and five Silent Prime Ministers (Clark, Turner, Mulroney, Chretien, Martin). I&#8217;ve often wondered why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-230</guid>
		<description>I also noticed that we&#039;ve not had a president from the Silent Generation. And, it is quite doubtful that we ever will.

Here&#039;s more of a list from the Silent Generation:

- Nina Simone
- Bob Dylan
- Jimi Hendrix
- Peter, Paul, and Mary (all three)
- The Beatles (three of four)
- Richie Havens

I really question the label of &quot;were just too old and conventional to fight for real change in the 60’s&quot;. 

From the political front to music to whatever else you want to discuss, I&#039;m willing to say that the Silent Generation was most surely involved in the fight for change in the 60&#039;s.

Do the reading on who was in this class. I think you&#039;ll be surprised.

Now, I&#039;m also willing to say that they might&#039;ve &quot;lost&quot; their way once they got into their more conservative years, and concentrated more on  things like the environment than civil rights, but I don&#039;t think the contributions made by them during this pivotal can be ignored.

Also, the three people that I highlighted above... perhaps some of the best and brightest of their generation... were assassinated. I&#039;m not sure how any generation would react to that in later life... 

And, I&#039;ll just leave you with a piece of what is surely a &quot;don&#039;t rock the boat&quot; type of song:

You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it&#039;s evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don&#039;t you know that you can count me out
Don&#039;t you know it&#039;s gonna be all right
all right, all right

* Even though I&#039;ve always been more of a Buffalo Springfield fan, I think this is appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also noticed that we&#8217;ve not had a president from the Silent Generation. And, it is quite doubtful that we ever will.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s more of a list from the Silent Generation:</p>
<p>- Nina Simone<br />
- Bob Dylan<br />
- Jimi Hendrix<br />
- Peter, Paul, and Mary (all three)<br />
- The Beatles (three of four)<br />
- Richie Havens</p>
<p>I really question the label of &#8220;were just too old and conventional to fight for real change in the 60’s&#8221;. </p>
<p>From the political front to music to whatever else you want to discuss, I&#8217;m willing to say that the Silent Generation was most surely involved in the fight for change in the 60&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Do the reading on who was in this class. I think you&#8217;ll be surprised.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m also willing to say that they might&#8217;ve &#8220;lost&#8221; their way once they got into their more conservative years, and concentrated more on  things like the environment than civil rights, but I don&#8217;t think the contributions made by them during this pivotal can be ignored.</p>
<p>Also, the three people that I highlighted above&#8230; perhaps some of the best and brightest of their generation&#8230; were assassinated. I&#8217;m not sure how any generation would react to that in later life&#8230; </p>
<p>And, I&#8217;ll just leave you with a piece of what is surely a &#8220;don&#8217;t rock the boat&#8221; type of song:</p>
<p>You say you want a revolution<br />
Well, you know<br />
We all want to change the world<br />
You tell me that it&#8217;s evolution<br />
Well, you know<br />
We all want to change the world<br />
But when you talk about destruction<br />
Don&#8217;t you know that you can count me out<br />
Don&#8217;t you know it&#8217;s gonna be all right<br />
all right, all right</p>
<p>* Even though I&#8217;ve always been more of a Buffalo Springfield fan, I think this is appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Sohigian</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Sohigian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-229</guid>
		<description>@bobby (aka bro&#039;). Yeah, Mom and Dad are Silents, and they were the helpmates in the 60&#039;s, but their generation has not produced a single President (McCain would have been) and their record in the legislature is, well, mixed. MLK, Malcolm and Bobby were certainly all Silents, and considered the best leaders of their generation, but they all met untimely ends. I agree they helped shake things up, but they, as a generation, were not the ones that had the moxie to rise up against the establishment. They include folks like Abbie Hoffman, Richard Alpert, Ken Kesey and others that definitely rallied against the establishment, but a vast majority of the people in the Silent generation were just too old and conventional to fight for real change in the 60&#039;s. There were rebels (like the folks mentioned) that were leaders of the youth movement, but by and large they were the &quot;Men in the Grey Flannel Suits&quot; that wished they were young enough to really take on the GI Generation. They may have been leaders of the movement, but the youth (Boomers) made up the movement.

The same is true today. Our President is Generation X. Most of the legislature are Boomers. But the people who will make the big changes as a generation over the next 10-20 years will be the Millennial generation, the young people. They will decide who to follow and what to believe. And they, like the GI Generation before them will get the credit for building a brave new world. 

Think about the GI&#039;s, born 1901-1924. They were the youthful soldiers during WWII, not the top brass. The top brass and were of the Lost (1883-1900) and Missionary (1860-1882) generations. Although FDR and Macarthur (Missionary) and Patton and Eisenhower (Lost) get credit for leading the efforts in WWII, the generation that is called the &quot;Greatest Generation&quot; is the GI&#039;s who fought in the war. The same is true for the Silents in the 60&#039;s. They may have produced the leaders who rallied the &quot;troops&quot; rebellion, but the generation that took on the task was the Boomers, and, as usual, the victors get to write the history books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bobby (aka bro&#8217;). Yeah, Mom and Dad are Silents, and they were the helpmates in the 60&#8242;s, but their generation has not produced a single President (McCain would have been) and their record in the legislature is, well, mixed. MLK, Malcolm and Bobby were certainly all Silents, and considered the best leaders of their generation, but they all met untimely ends. I agree they helped shake things up, but they, as a generation, were not the ones that had the moxie to rise up against the establishment. They include folks like Abbie Hoffman, Richard Alpert, Ken Kesey and others that definitely rallied against the establishment, but a vast majority of the people in the Silent generation were just too old and conventional to fight for real change in the 60&#8242;s. There were rebels (like the folks mentioned) that were leaders of the youth movement, but by and large they were the &#8220;Men in the Grey Flannel Suits&#8221; that wished they were young enough to really take on the GI Generation. They may have been leaders of the movement, but the youth (Boomers) made up the movement.</p>
<p>The same is true today. Our President is Generation X. Most of the legislature are Boomers. But the people who will make the big changes as a generation over the next 10-20 years will be the Millennial generation, the young people. They will decide who to follow and what to believe. And they, like the GI Generation before them will get the credit for building a brave new world. </p>
<p>Think about the GI&#8217;s, born 1901-1924. They were the youthful soldiers during WWII, not the top brass. The top brass and were of the Lost (1883-1900) and Missionary (1860-1882) generations. Although FDR and Macarthur (Missionary) and Patton and Eisenhower (Lost) get credit for leading the efforts in WWII, the generation that is called the &#8220;Greatest Generation&#8221; is the GI&#8217;s who fought in the war. The same is true for the Silents in the 60&#8242;s. They may have produced the leaders who rallied the &#8220;troops&#8221; rebellion, but the generation that took on the task was the Boomers, and, as usual, the victors get to write the history books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-227</guid>
		<description>should&#039;ve written year and a half, not three years. feeling my age!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should&#8217;ve written year and a half, not three years. feeling my age!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thegenxfiles.com/2009/03/17/6-reasons-you-should-listen-to-boomers-even-if-they-drive-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegenxfiles.com/?p=716#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

You say this:

2. They are, for younger Gen X’ers and older Millennials, our parents.

and 

6. The Silent Generation (born 1925-1942) were “old” right from the start, never having much of a chance to shake things up in their youth.

Just a reminder that both mom and dad are members of the Silent Generation, and not Baby Boomers. 

Guess the three years difference in our ages means that you perhaps don&#039;t remember some of the shaking-up of things that our parents did. 

But, I&#039;ll wager that many folks from this generation (who were between 23 and 40 when I was born in 1965) played pivotal rolls in shaking things up enough that we now have a black president.

Indeed, these fine folks all came from the silent generation:

- Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Malcom X
- Bobby Kennedy

Should I continue with the list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>You say this:</p>
<p>2. They are, for younger Gen X’ers and older Millennials, our parents.</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>6. The Silent Generation (born 1925-1942) were “old” right from the start, never having much of a chance to shake things up in their youth.</p>
<p>Just a reminder that both mom and dad are members of the Silent Generation, and not Baby Boomers. </p>
<p>Guess the three years difference in our ages means that you perhaps don&#8217;t remember some of the shaking-up of things that our parents did. </p>
<p>But, I&#8217;ll wager that many folks from this generation (who were between 23 and 40 when I was born in 1965) played pivotal rolls in shaking things up enough that we now have a black president.</p>
<p>Indeed, these fine folks all came from the silent generation:</p>
<p>- Martin Luther King, Jr.<br />
- Malcom X<br />
- Bobby Kennedy</p>
<p>Should I continue with the list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

